A friend in Utah recently received,
though friends of friends, a previously unknown letter from Bessie Hyde.
She wrote it to her aunt and uncle, Ruth and Millard Haley of Pittsburgh,
hours before her departure from Green River, Utah. The letter sheds some
new light on the Hydes as they prepared to depart on their fatal river
journey.
On a factual basis, Bessie mentions the scow as five-and-one-half feet
wide, not five feet wide as most other sources state. If accurate, this
would make the boat a bit more stable, yet less maneuverable than previously
thought. Bessie also mentions a recent visit to Pittsburgh—perhaps
on her 1927 trip East with Glen.
More significant, I think, is the vagueness of their plans and the lack
of any mention of writing, publicity, or the setting of records. This
aggravates a nagging suspicion in the back of my mind. When I wrote my
biography of the Hydes I tried to rely on factual data instead of rumor
and myth. Yet I may have inadvertently bought into the prevalent “record-setting
and publicity” motive for the Hydes’ adventure. Reviewing
the data now, I can find little factual basis for that assumption, other
than the cryptic notes made by Dock Marston on an interview with Adolph
Sutro made some thirty years after that Hydes perished. (Sutro had ridden
with the Hydes for two days below Phantom Ranch and been the last to see
them.) Yet the notes of the interview did not reveal what the questions
were, or the actual verbatim responses. And in previous correspondence
between Marston and Sutro, Sutro claimed to remember very little about
the trip.
In fact, if Bessie’s letter is at all indicative of their trip plans,
it appears they were simply on a grand adventure, much as Glen and his
sister Jeanne had been on their Salmon River journey two years earlier.
Any strong thoughts of publicity may have come much later—on the
river when Sutro was with the Hydes; later, in the evolution of Sutro’s
memories; or even in Marston’s much-abbreviated question-and-answer
notes with Sutro.
The lessons to me as a historian are to beware of myth, avoid assumptions—mine
or another’s—and be vigilant to the power of suggestion on
memories and perceptions. And remember that people often hear what they
intend to hear. The best sources are nearly always those recorded at the
time by those who were directly involved. With that, here’s Bessie:
|
Green River, Utah
Oct. 20, 1928
Dear Aunt Ruth and Uncle Mill,
I certainly did enjoy seeing you all in Pittsburgh and only wish my visit
could have been longer.
Margaret wrote that Upton was there for a few days and I know how glad
you were to see him. How is he getting along in school?
This is a funny little town (they claim over six hundred population -
but it just isn’t possible).
We plan on leaving in three or four hours. The boat is practically finished.
It’s rather large 20 ft. long, 5-1/2 ft. wide and 3 ft. high, and
is guided by a large sweep oar at each end.
We will go down the Green River and then the Colorado, (how far will depend
on how bad the water gets) making about a three two months trip. From
the river we’ll go to Los Angeles and spend three or four days there,
and then on up to San Francisco. I plan on doing a lot of sketching on
the trip, as, of course, the scenery will be wonderful.
We had one great scramble getting ready to leave-packing for the river
trip-packing the trunk to be sent to Los Angeles-and storing the other
things in the attic at the other house. Packing is an awful bother anyway,
although I must admit Glen did most of it.
I’m terribly excited and awfully anxious to start.
Write to me sometime (at Hansen, Idaho), and I’ll write you all
about the trip when we get out.
Love to Sally Lou
Lovingly,
Bessie Hyde
Footnote: I was able to track the source of this letter back to Millard
and Ruth Haley’s only living child, Sarah Louise Turan. She was
a toddler when the letter was written and was the “Sally Lou”
in the letter. Upton was her elder brother. Unfortunately, Ms. Turan could
shed little other information on the story of the Hydes.
Brad Dimock
|