I just completed my last commercial
trip of the 2003 season. On our way to Phantom Ranch, the marvelously
still air and sublime light of October graced our lives. Then, as southern
California and the north Kaibab Plateau burned, walls and rims became
mystically cloaked in smoke. Ash drifted silently onto our decks at Bass
camp and Stone Creek. With herds of desert bighorn sheep, we coughed and
wiped our noses until the southwesterly winds blew against us to Lava
Falls. A chill then came to the air at Parashant Canyon, a full moon,
and a view of weather fronts passing us by to the north. It was wonderful.
We viewed the erosion from the recent summer monsoon rains. It brought
big side canyon floods from Carbon Creek to Red Canyon. The monsoon also
hit big in tributary canyons from Deer Creek to Parashant Canyon. Side
canyon floods like these continue make rapids rockier, less navigable
and more harrowing. Beaches continue to erode from river fluctuations
and side canyon floods, and the streamside becomes more choked by vegetation.
As the quality of the riparian environment diminishes, demand for public
access only grows. In my many years as a Grand Canyon river guide, I’ve
not seen the canyon beaches more severely eroded. The canyon desperately
needs a beach-building flood release from the dam to restore and rejuvenate
habitat and camping areas. We are working toward this goal through the
Adaptive Management Program as the Colorado River basin drought moves
into its fifth year.
What will this winter bring to the Colorado River basin and river flows
in Grand Canyon? Following is a recent report from the Bureau of Reclamation.
Give us a “ring” if you want to talk about where to go next.
Operations
Releases from Glen Canyon Dam in November will be nearly identical to
what they were in October. In November, releases will average 8,000 cubic
feet per second (cfs) with a total of 476,000 acre-feet scheduled to be
released. On Mondays through Saturdays in November, daily fluctuations
due to load following will likely vary between a low of 5,000 cfs (during
late evening and early morning off-peak hours) to a high of 10,000 cfs
(during late afternoon and early evening on-peak hours). On Sundays, releases
will be 5,000 cfs from 7 p.m. until 7 a.m., and 8,000 cfs from 7 a.m.
until 7 p.m.
Releases from Glen Canyon Dam in December of 2003 will likely be higher
than November. The volume releases in December is likely to be 600,000
acre-feet (an average release of about 10,000 cfs).
Because of the draw down condition of Lake Powell, releases from Lake
Powell in water year 2004 are being scheduled to meet the minimum objective
release of 8.23 million acre-feet. This is consistent with the requirements
of the Criteria for Coordinated Long-Range Operation of Colorado River
Reservoirs.
Experimental Flows
Daily high fluctuating releases from Glen Canyon Dam, as part of the Glen
Canyon Dam experimental flows, were completed on March 31, 2003. From
January through March 2003 releases ranged between a high of 20,000 cfs
to a low of 5,000 cfs each day. These same high fluctuating releases are
scheduled to be repeated in January through March of 2004.
|
The January through March high
fluctuating releases were intended to benefit the endangered humpback
chub. Scientists have recognized that the humpback chub population has
been in general decline since highly fluctuating flows were curtailed
in November of 1991. Those flows helped keep the non-native fish, especially
the rainbow and brown trout, in check. The trout are thought to prey upon
and compete with native fish such as the endangered humpback chub.
The experimental flows from Glen Canyon Dam received environmental clearances
in December 2002. The flows were analyzed in an environmental assessment
in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The experimental
flows are the result of ongoing studies by scientists from the United
States Geological Survey and were recommended by the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive
Management Work Group, a Federal advisory committee. The experimental
flows address the decline of two key resources in the Grand Canyon: sediment
and population viability of endangered humpback chub. The Finding of No
Significant Impact on the experimental flows can be found at http://www.uc.usbr.gov/amp/flow_fonsi.pdf.
Basin Hydrology
Severe drought conditions in the Colorado River Basin continue. As we
move into a new water year there are no signals of the drought easing.
Water year 2004 began on October 1, 2003 and the first month of our new
water year was much warmer and drier than average. Basinwide precipitation
in October was only about thirty percent of average. Soil moisture levels
throughout the basin are very low, and as we move into winter it appears
likely that the snowpack will be building upon these very dry soils. The
scenario is not favorable for next spring’s runoff, as much of the
melting snow will be absorbed by the dry soil. Reclamation is estimating
that with average snowpack conditions this winter, runoff next spring
would be about 75 percent of average.
The Colorado River Basin is now in its fifth year of drought. Inflow volumes
have been below average for four consecutive years. Unregulated inflow
in water year 2003 was only 53 percent of average. Unregulated inflow
in 2000, 2001 and 2002 was 62, 59, and 25 percent of average, respectively.
Inflow in 2002 was the lowest ever observed since the completion of Glen
Canyon Dam in 1963.
The trend of low inflow continues. Unregulated inflow in October, 2003
will end up being only 55 percent of average. As of October 31, 2003,
observed inflow to Lake Powell is about 6,000 cfs, about 58 percent of
what is usually seen in late October.
Low inflows have reduced water storage in Lake Powell. The current elevation
of Lake Powell is 3,602.0 feet (98.0 feet from full pool). Current storage
is approximately 11.9 million acre-feet (49 percent of capacity). The
good news is that even after four years of severe drought, Lake Powell
is still storing a large volume of water (nearly 12 million acre-feet).
Updated October 31, 2003
Tom Ryan
Andre Potochnik
Adaptive Management Work Group
|